Replicating Example Post Structures in Post Generation: A Move Towards Flexibility

This post discusses a recent update to our post generation process, shifting from hardcoded sections to a more adaptable, example-driven approach.

The Old Approach

Previously, our post generation system rigidly enforced a predefined structure: Introduction, Development, Examples, and Conclusion. This inflexible format ignored the nuances and varied structures of different example posts, leading to inconsistencies and limitations in content creation.

The Problem

The hardcoded structure hindered our ability to effectively replicate the style and flow of chosen example posts. The LLM was forced to adhere to the default sections, even when the example post had a different arrangement. This resulted in a disconnect between the desired style and the generated output.

The Solution

To address this, we've implemented a change that prioritizes the structure of the example post. Now, when an example is provided, the LLM is instructed to replicate its exact structure. The default sections are only used when no example is selected, ensuring a more faithful adaptation of the desired style.

How it Works

The updated system analyzes the example post's structure and instructs the LLM to mirror that structure in the generated content. This ensures that the generated post aligns with the example in terms of section headings, order, and overall flow. For example, if the example post begins with a 'Problem' section followed by a 'Solution' and 'Results' section, the generated post will follow the same pattern.

Benefits

• Flexibility: Adapts to various post structures.
• Consistency: Ensures the generated post mirrors the style of the example.
• Improved Content Quality: Allows for more nuanced and contextually relevant content.

Example

Let's say we want to generate a post about implementing a new feature. Previously, the system would force an "Introduction," "Development," "Examples," and "Conclusion" structure, even if the example post flowed differently. Now, if the example post is structured as "Problem," "Proposed Solution," "Implementation Details," and "Results," the generated post will follow that exact structure. This leads to more coherent and well-aligned content.

Consider this illustrative example. Suppose the example post structure is:

## Problem

[Explanation of the problem]

## Solution

[Explanation of the solution]

The generated post will follow the same structure, ensuring stylistic consistency.

Conclusion

By replicating the structure of example posts, we're enhancing the flexibility and consistency of our content generation process. This allows for more nuanced and contextually relevant posts, ultimately improving the quality and effectiveness of our technical communication.