Documenting code, one commit at a time.
In the devlog-ist/landing project, we're focused on delivering high-quality content. A crucial part of this is ensuring that AI-generated content meets our standards before it's published.
AI models, particularly when generating longer pieces of content, can sometimes be cut short due to token limits or other constraints.
This post explores the implementation of cost tracking and budget limits for AI operations within the devlog-ist/landing project. We'll examine how per-request costs are tracked in EUR, how pricing is stored per model, and how monthly cost limits are enforced per plan.
The system now tracks the cost of each AI operation in EUR. This involves:
This post details the recent enhancements to the content generation process within the devlog-ist/landing project, focusing on the integration and management of LinkedIn prompts for improved content quality and platform-specific tailoring.
The primary objective was to enhance the content generation workflow by incorporating LinkedIn-specific prompts, allowing for more targeted and
This post addresses the importance of maintaining clean and relevant environment configurations in web development projects, specifically within the context of landing page deployments. Removing unused or obsolete variables ensures clarity, reduces potential confusion, and minimizes the risk of misconfiguration.
Environment variables are
Improving the accuracy and scope of technology detection is crucial for generating relevant and informative content. A recent update introduces rule-based technology detection, significantly expanding our ability to identify the technologies involved in code changes. This enhancement allows for more precise tagging and categorization of blog posts, benefiting both content creators and readers.
Improving the auditability of AI interactions is crucial for maintaining security and control. A recent update focuses on preventing the exposure of raw code to AI models, enhancing data security, and providing better insights into flagged code changes.
Previously, raw git diffs were sent to AI models for analysis. This approach, while providing detailed context,
This post discusses recent improvements to our application, focusing on enhanced security measures and smarter code generation capabilities.
We've introduced a 'safe mode' feature, giving tenants more control over security audits during post generation. By default, safe mode is enabled, ensuring all generated content undergoes a thorough security check.
Improving the way we audit code changes is crucial for maintaining security and stability in our applications. Recently, we transitioned from feeding raw Git diffs directly to our AI analysis tools to using structured summaries. This shift significantly enhances auditability and reduces the risk of exposing sensitive information.
Sending raw diffs to AI models
We've recently rolled out enhancements to our post generation process, focusing on flexibility and code accuracy. These updates include a 'safe mode' toggle and intelligent programming language detection.
Recognizing that different tenants have varying security needs, we've introduced a 'safe mode' toggle.
Security audits are crucial for maintaining the integrity of applications. However, overly sensitive rules can lead to false positives, particularly when dealing with illustrative code examples. This post discusses how to refine audit rules to distinguish between genuine security vulnerabilities and intentionally simplified or educational code snippets.
